Three is a huge problem in the United States.  It is not the economy or the occupation of Iraq, it’s the lack of knowledge about children’s health. Fish is supposed to be a healthy food item, but fish can also contain high amounts of mercury.  These are not dangerous to adults, but in a kid they can lead to some nasty side effects. Cocaine (apart from “being a helluva drug”) destroys a person.  However, the effects on a kid are still not understood.  There are competing studies on how much, if any, damage is done.

There is also the chemical industry.  When a new chemical comes out, the makers have to test the chemical on monkeys, rats, and other animals.  PETA is always upset about this, but it is the easiest and cheapest way to test if a chemical will harm human beings.  The problem is that it is not perfect, and little kids are not nearly protected enough using this setup. Now, abortion is a pretty hot issue, with Roe v. Wade being the presiding ruling on all things concerning the fetus.  Some people want to outlaw abortion, others want a woman to have the choice, and others want the gray area in the middle.  I am here to solve these two problems.
We are going to outlaw abortion.  It kills unborn children, and doing testing on unborn children can provide some much needed medical data.  If a mother does not want to have her child and is going to kill it, might as well put it to good use beforehand.  Introduce it to cocaine and study the effects.  Feed it lead chips and take notes on what exactly does happen.  The child has now contributed to society.  It may even live a healthy life after being used to test a chemical that does not destroy it. Perhaps it will get lucky and be used to test “natural male enhancement” pills that work.  The worst thing that can happen is that the baby is introduced to a very toxic chemical that bio-accumulates and dies.
At this point we are stuck with baby or small small child with a toxin, and are going to have to dispose of it.  We can’t just send it to the landfill, it could leak and destroy the living population.  Toxic Dead Babies (TDB) will become the generations greatest problem.  You can put it to the Yucca Mountains with nuclear waste, but that is a long distance to travel for dead toxic babies.  Also, the Yucca Mountains were not meant to hold that much extra waste, and Obama has cut funding to the site.  This is why I am proposing to burn the toxic dead babies. With all the chemical scrubbers and other technological advances, we can clean the air that would be coming out of the stacks.  This will also help recuperate some of the lost energy associated with carrying a baby to full term. There will be some particles that leak out of the stacks, but we can just place this in the middle of a wetlands, to keep the poison away from us.
I am not sure what has stopped us from carrying out this action previously.  It seems to me to be one of the most efficent ways to test deadly items on the most fragile of creatures, while also pleasing anti-abortion activists. We can also use them as a mode of alternative energy, everybody loves alternative energy.  I am sure as long as we place the cremation plants in the wetlands, where nobody will try to move next to them, then everybody should be safe.